| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 1998-04-19
                 
                 
                Desaster/Daten öffentlich
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      q/depesche 98.4.19 
 
Desaster/Daten öffentlich 
 
Auf einen Schlag könnten die Anrainer von etwa 70.000 bestimmten 
Lagerplätzen in den USA wissen, dass Grund zur Unruhe ist. Die U. 
S. Umweltschutzbehörde erwägt, die Alarmpläne für alle 
Chemie/Müll/Sonder/Lager ins Netz zu setzen. 
Sogenannte security experts sind dagegen.      
 
 
Experts - Disaster Data On Net A Hazard 04/17/98 
USA TODAY, 1998 APR 17 -- By Traci Watson and Gary Fields, USA 
TODAY. 
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has roiled the 
intelligence and  
security communities with a proposal to put disaster data about 
chemical  
storage sites on the Internet, USA TODAY has learned. 
 
Outraged security experts say the database would be a convenient 
tool for terrorists. 
 
EPA officials say that most of the information is publicly 
available anyway and the public has the right to know it. 
 
Congress in 1990 required that the "worst-case scenario" data be 
made  
public. The EPA chose the Internet as the best conduit. 
 
The EPA estimates that data on 70,000 sites would be submitted. 
The data  
would include sites where chemicals are stored, the most 
devastating  
potential accident and plans to respond to such an incident. 
 
The Justice Department and FBI, as well as the CIA and State 
Department are working closely with the EPA. 
 
Several members of Congress, including Senate Majority Leader 
Trent Lott, have written the EPA to protest the proposal. 
 
FBI agents say putting the data on the Net creates a blueprint for 
chemical mayhem. 
 
Some suggest keeping the information in libraries, where access 
could be  
limited. 
 
But the EPA will make the final decision, which is not expected 
for at least a month. 
 
"No action will be taken until we come to a resolution with the 
agencies  
involved," says spokeswoman Loretta Ucelli. 
 
The plan was first reported in Sources Investigative eJournal, an 
Internet newsletter. 
 
EPA officials point out that previous posting of chemical 
information on the Internet prompted companies to cut back use of 
hazardous materials and that it is important for people who live 
near sites to know the risks they face. 
 
Security experts say they are concerned. 
 
"I don't think we're in opposition to the public knowing these 
facilities are present," says Christopher Ronay, formerly with the 
FBI, now president  
of the Institute of Makers of Explosives. "But I don't think we 
want to post on the Internet . . . the facility's (locale) and 
exactly what's in it." 
 
(Copyright 1998, USA Today: <A 
HREF="http://www.usatoday.com">http://www.usatoday.com
                   
</A> 
/WIRES GOVT, ONLINE/) 
 From www.newsbytes.com 
 
 
 
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by Harkank 
published on: 1998-04-19 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |