| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 1998-05-22
                 
                 
                USA: Mehr Abhör/schnittstellen für GSM
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      q/depesche 98.5.22.1 
 
USA: Mehr Abhör/schnittstellen für GSM 
 
CALEA oder Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act  - was für ein schöner Name für ein 
Gesetz, das GSM Betreiber verpflichtet, Abhörschnitt/Stellen einzurichten.  Das FBI wünscht eine 
Ausweitung derselben,  
das Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) wünscht dies ausdrücklich nicht. 
                  
CDT URGES FCC TO PROTECT PHONE PRIVACY AGAINST FBI SURVEILLANCE DEMANDS 
May 21, 1998 
 
The privacy rights of Americans are at risk, and the nation's historical 
balance between privacy and law enforcement is being upset, by FBI wiretap 
proposals, the Center for Democracy and Technology (CDT) argued in 
extensive comments filed with the Federal Communications Commission late 
yesterday. 
 
CDT's comments can be found at: 
http://www.cdt.org/digi_tele/calea052098.html
                   
 
The Commission is reviewing the impact of the 1994 Communications 
Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA), a law that CDT argued in the 
comments it filed was only 'intended to preserve a minimum law 
enforcement surveillance capability in the face of technological change' 
and was not meant 'to serve as the basis for mandated expansions in that 
capability.' CALEA, CDT explained, is the latest chapter in the 30-year 
history of federal wiretap laws, which have always sought to balance 
constitutional privacy protections and law enforcement interests. 
 
CALEA calls for telecommunications companies to ensure that their systems 
do not impede law enforcement wiretaps by Oct. 25, 1998. But FBI efforts to 
use the law to enhance its surveillance abilities -- including creation of 
a cellular phone tracking system -- led CDT in March to ask the Commission 
to step in to protect privacy.  At the same time, the FBI, 
telecommunications industry associations and individual companies also 
filed petitions with the FCC raising a number of issues. The FBI asked the 
Commission to use the law to impose further surveillance capabilities, such 
as monitoring parties to a conference call after the suspect has dropped 
off the call. The Commission issued a notice April 20 soliciting public 
comment on the implementation of CALEA. 
 
Responding to the Commission's request for comments on the privacy issues 
inherent in CALEA's implementation, CDT argued that electronic surveillance 
capabilities have been subject to both technological and legal limitations 
since Congress first passed legislation on the issue in 1968.  Both in that 
year and in 1994, when CALEA was passed, Congress 'crafted a legislative 
scheme intended to balance the interests of law enforcement and privacy,' 
CDT said. 
 
The FCC has a 'pivotal' role in ensuring that Congress' historical balance 
is applied to technologies that form the basis for a wide variety of new 
communications services, CDT argued. CDT's challenge highlights two 
technologies - wireless location information and packet network services - 
that are at the very heart of the digital communications revolution, 
because: 
 
  ** tens of millions of Americans rely on cellular phones and PCS devices 
for personal and professional communications on a daily basis, and 
 
  ** the Internet, with its highly efficient packet-based architecture, is 
credited as the sine qua non of the information revolution, and has 
expanded commercial, political, and educational opportunities for 
individuals in the United States and around the world. 
 
CDT asked the FCC to reject the FBI's location tracking proposal, to 
develop standards for surveillance in packet networks that protect the 
privacy of communications the government is not authorized to intercept, 
and to reject FBI requests for capabilities that go beyond the narrow 
mandate of the Act. 
 
relayed by graeme browning. tnx. 
http://www.cdt.org
                   
 
-.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.- 
TIP 
http://www.chelidonia.com
                   
keywords: santorini, oia, holidays  
 
-.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by  
published on: 1998-05-22 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |