| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 1999-03-02
                 
                 
                Fuck Intel P III
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      Wer Intel-Aktien besitzt & solche nicht ehebaldigst in Umlauf  
bringt, der kann kein/e Gute/r sein, so sagen Privacy  
International, Junkbusters & Epic zum Identichip & fordern  
Fondsmanager zum Verkaufen von Intel/beteiligungen auf. 
 
post/scrypt: AMD K7 rules ok OR get real get a Mac? 
 
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-   
-- Appealing to Socially Responsible Investors, Activists  
Extend Campaign to Stop ID in Pentium III chip -- 
 
Washington -- March 1, 1999 -- EPIC, Junkbusters and  
Privacy International today called on investment fund  
managers to divest their holdings in Intel (NASDAQ: INTC),  
the company responsible for the controversial chip ID feature.  
The privacy organizations that launched the national boycott  
against the chipmaker more than a month ago said that the  
investment community has a social responsibility to pull out  
support for Intel. 
 
Jason Catlett, President of Junkbusters Corp., said that all  
investors, small and large, should look at more than one  
``bottom line'' with Intel. ``The social bottom line takes notice  
of Intel's Orwellian vision of the future where people's  
movements on the Internet are constantly tracked. The  
economic bottom line considers the lost growth for global  
electronic commerce because consumers fear for their  
privacy online.'' 
 
Despite widespread public concern, Intel has refused to  
remove the ID feature from its chip. It has merely changed its  
recommended software configuration. On Thursday major PC  
manufacturers announced that they had taken steps to try to  
disable the feature as strongly as possible in software, but  
doubts had already been raised by a report by the German  
PC magazine c't that the feature can still be turned on  
without the user's knowledge or consent. The chip and PCs  
containing the chip went on sale Friday after more than a  
month of adverse publicity. Intel's share price dropped  
sharply on several pieces of bad news including the filing of a  
formal complaint with the Federal Trade Commission alleging  
"unfair and deceptive practices" over Intel's portrayal of the ID  
feature. The privacy groups want the ID feature permanently  
removed from the chip and said they will continue expanding  
the boycott campaign until Intel does so. 
 
An open letter sent Sunday to six key socially responsible  
mutual funds suggested several possible actions for investors: 
 
* Divest Intel holdings as soon as possible. * Add Intel to  
"screening" lists of companies that are to be excluded from  
investment based on social criteria, specifically a disregard  
for the fundamental human right of privacy. * Dialog with Intel  
and PC manufacturers to remove the identity feature. *  
Support programs of shareholder activism, by means such as  
submitting and voting proxy resolutions. 
 
The six funds include the Domini Social Equity Fund  
(DSEFX), the billion-dollar Dreyfus Third Century Fund  
(DRTHX), and the Parnassus Fund (PARNX). Several have  
significant investments in Intel. 
 
Socially responsible investors have strongly influenced  
corporate decision-making in favor of causes such as human  
rights. More than $1 trillion in assets are under management  
in socially and environmentally responsible portfolios,  
according to a 1997 report by the nonprofit Social Investment  
Forum. 
 
Simon Davies, director general of London-based watchdog  
group Privacy International said, ``The potential of the ID  
number in the Pentium III to be used as a tracking  
mechanism is of particular concern in countries governed by  
regimes hostile to rights and freedoms. The export of the  
chips to such countries will not only compromise human  
rights and freedom of expression, but could endanger those  
involved in political reform and human rights advocacy.'' 
 
Marc Rotenberg, executive director of the Washington-based  
Electronic Privacy Information Center said, ``Responsible  
investment firms need to consider the social impact of  
information technology that threatens the privacy of American  
citizens. The protection of privacy in the twenty-first century  
may be as great a challenge as the protection of the  
environment has been in the twentieth century. Investment  
firms have a responsibility to safeguard our future.'' 
 
Resources on the Web: 
 
The letter and addressees:  
http://www.junkbusters.com/intel.html
                   
 
Boycott campaign homepage:  
http://www.bigbrotherinside.com
                   
 
Press release 2/26 on the FTC and PC manufacturers:  
http://www.junkbusters.com/nr16.html
                   
 
Report from the Social Investment Forum:  
http://www.socialinvest.org/Areas/Research/trends/1997-
                   
Trends.htm 
 
Electronic Privacy Information Center: http://www.epic.org
                   
 
Privacy International: http://www.privacyinternational.org
                   
 
This document is http://www.junkbusters.com/nr17.html
                   
 
 
 
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by Harkank 
published on: 1999-03-02 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |