| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 2001-02-03
                 
                 
                Hacker Schmitz hat hoch gestapelt
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      Der auf den hinteren Seiten der Bild-Zeitung und in deutschen  
Talkshows gern gesehene, angebliche Superhacker hat: 
 
- Eine Firma namens Kiminvestor, die in 5 Jahren eine  
Milliarde Euro wert sein soll, aber nirgendwo eingetragen ist 
- Mitglieder eines Aufsichtsrats, die dementieren, dass es  
einen Aufsichtsrat gibt 
- Hausverbot beim CCC 
- Angeblich 10 Prozent seiner nicht registrierten Firma zu 95  
Prozent verkauft, um damit Letsbuyit.com zu retten. 
 
Hintergrund 
http://www.quintessenz.at/archiv/msg01410.html
                   
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-   
By Boris Grondahl and Rick Wray 
 
LetsBuyIt.com thought it had found its saviour last week in  
former hacker Kim Schmitz. But an investigation by The  
Standard Europe has uncovered a tale of confusion that  
raises serious doubts about the ability of Schmitz to fund the  
aggregate buying network to profitability. It has emerged that  
Schmitz's investment vehicle is not even a registered  
company in Germany. 
 
Schmitz, a convicted German computer hacker, emerged as  
a white knight on 24 January, offering part of the 4 million  
demanded by LetsBuyIt's Dutch administrators to stave off  
immediate bankruptcy proceedings. He also promised that  
his investment vehicle Kimvestor would provide up to 50  
million euros to back the business through to projected  
profitability in the fourth quarter of next year. 
 
But it is hard to see what Kimvestor has to offer except  
promises. The weekend after receiving the proposal,  
LetsBuyIt's chief executive John Palmer held meetings with  
Schmitz. It soon became clear to Palmer that despite  
Schmitz's claims, Kimvestor has no funds at its disposal. 
... 
Schmitz is looking to raise 20 million euros by selling a 10  
per cent stake in Kimvestor to new shareholders - a move  
which will value the self-styled "start-up factory" at 200  
million euros. Schmitz told The Standard Europe he had  
successfully sold "95 per cent" of the 10 per cent share  
being offered but declined to name the individuals backing  
him. All he would say is that they were "well-known CEOs  
and businessmen". 
 
These backers are taking a chance on Schmitz. The  
company, Kimvestor, has not been properly set up. Schmitz  
offered these backers shares in Kimvestor in a private  
placement which was backed up by an online prospectus  
that claimed the business was founded in January 2000.  
However, the German authorities have no record of the  
business. 
... 
Under German law, a company can exist before it has been  
registered, but this must be made plain to the authorities,  
and would have been on record for the Standard Europe to  
see. Schmitz has failed to follow this basic procedure. There  
are other procedures that Schmitz has failed to follow: it  
seems that Kimvestor doesn't control the assets which  
Schmitz has claimed it does. 
 
According to the Kim-vestor Web site, the business has a  
share of three companies founded by Schmitz himself: Data  
Protect, Megacar and Monkeybank. However these shares  
are owned by Data Protect GmbH, of which Schmitz is chief  
executive. 
 
Schmitz also said that Kimvestor will "close an investment  
fund worth 200 million euros on 10 February". He declined to  
name the sources of his capital or the potential companies  
he would invest this money in. 
... 
In Kimvestor's four-page prospectus, Schmitz promises that  
the company will float within 18 months and be worth 1 billion  
euros in five years. He also lays claim to a supervisory board  
made up of three members of the German technocracy:  
Gerhard Barth, the chief technical officer of the German  
financial institution Dresdner Bank; Gerrit Huy, an executive  
of media group KirchPayTV; and Dieter Haban of car giant  
DaimlerChrysler. 
 
In fact, a spokeswoman for Barth told The Standard Europe  
that he is not on the board because there is none. Haban  
explained that the board is currently being formed and while  
he has full confidence in Schmitz, he knows little about the  
operation of the business, nor whether it actually has any  
funds. Huy was unavailable for comment. 
 
As The Standard Europe went to press, LetsBuyIt's John  
Palmer was trying to put the finishing touches to a rescue  
package which will provide him with the 40 million euros he  
has publicly stated will get the business to profit. That  
package relies more heavily upon LetsBuyIt's existing venture  
capital backers and new sources of funding than it does on  
Schmitz. 
 
With Kimvestor in such disarray, it is likely that Schmitz's  
involvement in LetsBuyIt will initially have to be funded out of  
his own pocket. His personal wealth is unknown and comes  
predominantly from the sale of 80 per cent of software  
security firm Data Protect early last year to TÜV Rheinland- 
Berlin-Brandenburg, a technology firm. 
 
The amount that Schmitz received for the business has never  
been made public. However, TÜV spokesman Tobias  
Kirchhoff said the business is not large: it employs just 15  
people and has DM-denominated revenues "in the seven  
figures". 
 
More confusion surrounds Schmitz's criminal escapades.  
Even his much-publicised claim to have altered the credit  
rating of former German Chancellor Helmut Kohl is not  
backed up by court records. 
 
Schmitz styles himself as a hacker hero, but has few friends  
among German hackers. This is at least partly because  
some German hackers believe he shopped them to the police  
when he was arrested. 
 
The Chaos Computer Club (CCC) has barred him from its  
meetings. The CCC spokesman Andy Müller-Maguhn  
explains: "Nobody wants to be connected with him." 
 
Members of the CCC also take a dim view of Schmitz's  
bragging. In the Kimvestor prospectus he claims to have  
hacked into Nasa, the Pentagon and Citigroup. But Müller- 
Maguhn dismisses these claims as "made up". Schmitz -  
who used the hacker nickname "Kimble", after Dr Richard  
Kimball, star of the American TV series The Fugitive - also  
claims to have once broken into Citibank and transferred $20  
million (21.6 million euros) in small transactions from 4  
million accounts to Greenpeace. 
 
Sara Holden, a spokesperson for environmental campaigners  
Greenpeace International says this is "just not true". 
 
She added: "Twenty million dollars would have been half our  
annual budget in the mid-1990s, and I am sure we would  
have noticed this [boost to our funds]." 
 
In fact, Citibank fell victim to hackers that caused $10 million  
(10.8 million euros) in damages in the mid-1990s. But a  
Russian hacker was charged and convicted of the break-in,  
and he had no links to Greenpeace. 
... 
The verdict, announced by a court in Munich in March 1998,  
states that Schmitz was arrested twice in 1994, at the age of  
20, and detained for a month both times. He was convicted of  
11 cases of computer fraud, 10 cases of "data espionage",  
11 cases of what amounts to stealing business secrets, the  
receiving of stolen goods and fraud. 
 
However, he received just a two-year suspended sentence  
because he was under-age when he carried out many of  
these offences. 
 
One of the charges related to a scam which earned Schmitz  
over DM120,000. (61,000 euros). Having bought two thousand  
stolen phone card account numbers from US-based hackers,  
Schmitz then set up chat lines in the Caribbean and Hong  
Kong and developed a computer program that automatically  
called those lines using the stolen cards. 
... 
But perhaps the one crime that says the most about Schmitz  
is the fact that when the college drop-out applied for a credit  
card, he did so under his own name - but with the addition of  
"Dr".  
 
Full Text 
http://europe.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,14368,00.html  
 
 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by Harkank 
published on: 2001-02-03 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |