| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 1998-10-05
                 
                 
                US-Spionageprozess: Verdeckte Abhoerprotokolle
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      Woher wohl alle diese Daten gekommen sind, auf denen die 
Anklage gegen den mutmasslichen Spion Kurt Stand basiert? 
Der morgen in Alexandria (VA) beginnende Prozess wird wenig 
Klarheit in diese Frage bringen, weil die Federals die 
Herkunft der abgehörten Daten nicht offenlegen müssen. Der 
Verteidiger kann die Qualität der vorgebrachten Indizien 
daher auch nicht in Frage stellen & findet dies daher nicht 
fair. 
 
-.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.- 
ALEXANDRIA, Va. An espionage trial set to begin in federal 
court here on Tuesday highlights what even the secret 
court's supporters admit is its weakness: The court's 
secrecy can make it very difficult for defendants caught on 
the wiretaps to defend themselves.  
... 
"Under law I can't find out what the wiretap was based on, 
whether the information was flawed, whether the judge was 
correct to authorize it. There's a fundamental issue of 
fairness here," says Richard Sauber, a Washington, D.C., 
lawyer defending accused spy Kurt Stand.  
... 
The law requires the Justice Department, and usually the FBI 
or the National Security Agency, to show a judge that the 
target is a foreign government or agent engaging in 
"clandestine intelligence gathering activities" or 
terrorism. "The spirit of the thing is to hold the (wiretap 
requests) to a high legal standard," says William Webster, 
director of the FBI when FISA was passed. "That's a large 
departure from the way things had been done."  
... 
Says David Banisar, researcher for the Electronic Privacy 
Information Center: "There are mistakes made in ordinary 
warrant processes, from getting the wrong address to not 
having probable cause, and they can be corrected when 
lawyers attack the warrant. "  
 
"That can't happen here," he says. "We'll never know how 
many mistakes are made because the (secret) court's 
proceeding isn't public."  
 
full text 
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nds1.htm  
 
relayed by 
jericho@dimensional.com 
 
-.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.- 
q/depesche is powered by http://www.netsphere.at
                   
handicrafters of fine mailing-lists and more 
-.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by Harkank 
published on: 1998-10-05 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |